Vans are the backbone of the UK’s working economy. There are around 4.5 million light commercial vehicles registered in Great Britain, and the majority are owned by businesses that run more than one. If your operation has two or more vans on the road, insuring them individually is rarely the most cost-effective or administratively sensible approach. A dedicated van fleet insurance policy consolidates your vehicles onto a single annual renewal, unlocks any-driver flexibility, and gives your insurer the full picture of how your fleet performs, which almost always produces a better premium than a stack of separate policies.

This guide goes well beyond the basics. It covers what van fleet insurance actually includes and excludes, how underwriters assess van-specific risks like goods in transit, tools-in-transit, and bodywork modifications, which classes of use apply to common van-based trades, and what the key cost drivers look like in practice. Whether you run three Ford Transits for a plumbing business or 30 Sprinters for a regional distribution operation, the principles are the same: the detail of your policy determines whether you are properly covered when it matters.

Van fleet insurance sits at the intersection of commercial vehicle law, goods-in-transit liability, and fleet underwriting. Getting it right requires understanding all three. The sections below work through each in turn.

What van fleet insurance covers, and what it does not

A van fleet policy covers the same three core levels as any UK motor insurance: third-party only, third-party fire and theft, and fully comprehensive. In practice, the overwhelming majority of commercial van fleets are insured on a comprehensive basis, because the cost difference versus third-party fire and theft is modest at fleet level and the difference in claims exposure is significant. Third-party only cover is the legal minimum under the Road Traffic Act 1988, and it means your own vehicle damage is not covered at all.

Beyond the core motor cover, van fleet policies can be extended with a range of additions. The most commercially important are goods-in-transit (GIT) cover, which protects the cargo your vans are carrying, and tools-in-transit (TIT) cover, which protects tools and equipment left in the van overnight or in transit. Neither of these is included as standard in a motor fleet policy. They are underwritten separately, with their own limits, excesses, and exclusions. A plumbing contractor with three vans and £8,000 of tools per vehicle needs explicit TIT cover; without it, a break-in leaves every van’s contents uninsured.

Other common extensions for van fleets include employers’ liability (legally required once you employ drivers, at a minimum of £5 million), public liability (covering third-party bodily injury or property damage not covered by motor insurance, such as a delivery driver dropping a parcel on a customer’s foot), fleet breakdown cover, and windscreen or glass cover. Van fleet insurance built around the right combination of these extensions is materially different from a bare motor policy, and the gap between the two shows up directly in the claims experience of under-insured fleets.

Classes of use: how your vans are driven determines the cover you need

The class of use declared on a fleet policy is not a formality. If a driver uses a van in a way that falls outside the declared class and a claim arises, the insurer can decline it. For van fleets, the relevant classes break down into three main categories. Social, domestic and pleasure (SDP) covers personal use including commuting to a single permanent workplace, but nothing else. Class 1 business use covers the policyholder using the van for their own business or profession, including travel to multiple sites. Carriage of own goods is the most common class for trades: it covers a driver transporting tools, materials, and equipment that belong to the business for the purpose of carrying out work.

If your business charges other people to transport their goods, the correct class is carriage of goods for hire and reward. This is a distinct underwriting category, typically rated higher than carriage of own goods, and it is the basis on which courier fleets, same-day delivery operators, and last-mile logistics companies need to be covered. Using a carriage-of-own-goods policy for paid delivery work is a common and serious coverage gap. The HSE guidance on driving at work is also relevant here: employers must ensure the vehicles their staff use are correctly insured for the work being undertaken.

For mixed-use fleets, where some vans carry own goods and others carry goods for customers, the policy must explicitly reflect both uses. It is not sufficient to cover one van on carriage-of-own-goods and assume that drivers occasionally using another van for customer deliveries are covered. Underwriters assess van fleet risk by use class as much as by vehicle value, and any inconsistency between the declared use and actual use creates potential grounds for claim denial.

Courier and delivery van fleets: why hire-and-reward cover costs more, and how to manage it

Courier and last-mile delivery fleets are one of the most active and fastest-growing segments of the UK van insurance market, driven by the structural shift to e-commerce. They are also consistently among the most expensive to insure. A standard hire-and-reward van fleet typically attracts premiums 40–60% higher than an equivalent carriage-of-own-goods fleet, and the reasons are structural: higher average annual mileage (often 40,000–60,000 miles per vehicle versus 15,000–25,000 for a trade van), multi-drop urban routing with frequent stops, tight delivery windows that create time pressure for drivers, and cargo that, in aggregate, has a high value and high claim frequency.

The gig economy introduces an additional complication. Fleets that use self-employed owner-drivers or sub-contractors alongside employed staff need to be explicit about how those drivers are covered. Some fleet policies extend to sub-contracted drivers subject to declaration; others require each owner-driver to hold their own hire-and-reward cover. Mixing employed and self-employed drivers without clear underwriting agreement is a significant gap that only tends to surface when a claim is made. For the full picture on insuring courier operations, our fleet insurance for courier and delivery companies guide covers parcel carrier requirements, gig economy driver structures, and GIT limits in detail.

Van types, payload categories, and how underwriters rate them

Not all vans are treated the same by underwriters. The vehicle’s gross vehicle weight (GVW), its body type, and its typical payload all feed into the risk assessment. A refrigerated 3.5-tonne Sprinter carrying perishable goods is rated differently from a standard panel van carrying electrical cables, even if both are driven by the same type of driver on the same routes. The table below summarises the main van categories and the underwriting factors that apply to each.

Note: GVW figures are typical ranges. Always declare the actual GVW of each vehicle. Vans over 3.5t move into HGV insurance territory and require a different policy class.

How van fleet insurance premiums are calculated

Van fleet premiums are built from a combination of fleet-level factors and vehicle-level factors. The underwriter is trying to answer one question: how often will this fleet generate a claim, and how much will those claims cost? For van fleets specifically, the loss drivers that matter most are theft (both vehicle and contents), at-fault road traffic accidents, and goods-in-transit losses. Understanding how each of these is weighted helps you present your risk in the most favourable light at renewal.

Claims history is the dominant factor. A fleet with a loss ratio (claims paid as a percentage of premium earned) below 40% over three years is considered attractive by most insurers and will command the keenest pricing. A loss ratio above 70% will attract loadings or, in some cases, market exits. If you are starting a new van fleet and have no claims history, insurers will rate you on industry benchmarks for your trade category, which is typically less favourable than a track record. For new businesses, fleet insurance for new businesses explains the specific challenges and how to address them.

Driver profile is the second major factor. Any-driver policies are rated on the youngest and least-experienced driver who could theoretically drive the fleet. Restricting driving to named drivers over 25 with clean licences can produce meaningful premium reductions, particularly on smaller fleets where one high-risk driver has an outsized impact on the risk pool. DVLA licence checks via the government’s online service should be run on all drivers before they are added to the policy, and repeated at least annually.

Fleet size drives the law of large numbers. At two or three vans, the risk pool is small and one significant claim can materially damage the loss ratio. At ten or more vans, the portfolio becomes more predictable and pricing becomes more competitive. Most underwriters apply noticeable volume discounts from five vans upward. Beyond 20 vehicles, captive insurer structures and self-insured retention layers become available to larger operators. For a deeper look at how van fleet pricing compares to wider fleet costs, see our complete UK fleet insurance cost guide. You can also compare quotes directly on our fleet insurance hub.

Van-specific risks: goods in transit, tools cover, and loading liability

The greatest source of underinsurance in UK van fleets is not the vehicle itself but what is inside it. Motor insurance protects the van as a vehicle. It does not protect the contents. This distinction is fundamental and frequently misunderstood, particularly by smaller operators who assume that because the van is insured, everything in it is covered.

Goods-in-transit (GIT) cover protects cargo being carried in the van. For businesses that transport their own stock or materials, GIT cover can be added as an extension to the van fleet policy, typically with a single-consignment limit and an aggregate annual limit. For businesses carrying goods belonging to customers, GIT cover must also include liability for third-party cargo: if you damage or lose a customer’s goods, your liability to that customer is not covered by your motor policy. A removal company running six Luton vans, for example, needs GIT cover with a per-load limit matching the maximum value of any single consignment it takes on, which for a high-end house move could easily reach £100,000.

Tools-in-transit (TIT) cover is specifically relevant to trade fleets. A sole trader with two Transit vans carrying £6,000 of tools each has £12,000 of uninsured exposure on every working day unless TIT cover is in place. Underwriters typically impose conditions on TIT cover, the most common being that tools must not be left in an unoccupied vehicle overnight, or that if they are, a specified level of security (slam locks, deadlocks, or a secure storage vault) must be fitted. Failing to meet these conditions at the point of a claim voids the TIT extension, not just reduces the payout.

Loading and unloading liability is the third gap that trips up van fleet operators. The moment goods leave the vehicle and are being carried into a premises, motor insurance ceases to apply. If a delivery driver drops a parcel on a customer’s foot in a car park, or a fitter’s apprentice cracks a floor tile while carrying in equipment, the claim falls outside the motor policy entirely. Public liability cover, extended to include loading and unloading operations, is the correct instrument here. Most commercial van fleet brokers will package public liability alongside the motor fleet insurance policy, but the limits need to match the actual liability exposure of your operations: £1 million public liability is standard, but trade contractors working on commercial sites are increasingly required to carry £5 million or £10 million.

Racking, conversions, and custom bodywork: getting the insured value right

A significant proportion of commercial vans in the UK are not sold in the standard configuration in which they are insured. Racking systems, internal shelving, drawer units, roof bars, body conversions, livery wraps, and specialised equipment such as hydraulic tail lifts or refrigeration units can add between £2,000 and £20,000 to the cost of a fully fitted van. If the insured value on the policy reflects only the base vehicle value, the fleet is materially underinsured from the day of first use.

When declaring van values for a fleet insurance policy, the insured value should represent the vehicle’s full replacement cost in its operational condition, including all permanently fitted equipment. This is not the same as the manufacturer’s list price, and it is not the same as the current market value of an equivalent second-hand vehicle. It is the cost to replace the van and have it fitted and ready to work. For a fleet of ten vans with £5,000 of racking each, failing to include that in the insured value represents £50,000 of uninsured exposure that will only become apparent after a serious accident or theft.

Body conversions also affect the vehicle’s risk profile in ways the underwriter needs to know about. A standard panel van converted to a dropside flatbed is a different risk from the vehicle that left the factory. The conversion changes the vehicle’s aerodynamic profile, its centre of gravity, its load-securing requirements under the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986, and potentially its GVW category. All material modifications must be declared to the insurer.

Van fleet premium scenarios: what does it actually cost?

Premium ranges for van fleet insurance vary considerably based on trade type, driver profile, claims history, fleet size, and geographical operating area. The scenarios below are illustrative based on 2024 and 2025 market intelligence for UK van fleets. They represent mid-market pricing for fleets with clean or near-clean loss histories.

Note: These are illustrative ranges for mid-market risks with no major recent claims. Urban fleets with any-driver policies, high-value cargo, or adverse loss history will sit at the higher end or above these ranges. Premiums correct as of early 2025; market conditions change. Always obtain multiple quotes via a specialist broker.

Telematics, dashcams, and van security: the tools that reduce premiums

The fastest way to reduce van fleet insurance costs over a two-to-three year period is to systematically reduce the frequency and severity of claims. Telematics, dashcams, and physical security measures each contribute to this, and most fleet insurers now price them in explicitly. A van fleet that can demonstrate telematics-evidenced driver behaviour improvements and a 24-month trend of declining incident rates is in a materially stronger negotiating position at renewal than one relying solely on the previous year’s loss ratio.

Telematics (GPS trackers with driving behaviour monitoring) typically generate premium discounts of 5–15% at renewal for fleets that share the data with their insurer and can demonstrate improvement. They also provide GPS tracking in the event of theft, which directly reduces the cost of theft claims. Fleet telematics systems used correctly can cut fuel costs by 10–20% as well, making the hardware and subscription costs easy to justify beyond the insurance benefit. Our guide to fleet trackers and telematics covers the main systems and how insurers use the data.

Van security measures matter most for tools-in-transit and vehicle theft risk. Slam locks (which automatically lock the van doors when closed, preventing casual access via a handle pull) and deadlocks (secondary locking mechanisms that operate independently of the central locking) are the most commonly required modifications for TIT cover. Insurers of high-theft trade vans will often make deadlocks or slam locks a condition of cover, not just a discount trigger. Catalogued security products that appear on Thatcham Research’s approved security systems list carry the most weight with underwriters.

Dashcams serve a dual purpose: they reduce fraudulent claims (ghost accidents, cash-for-crash incidents) and they accelerate the settlement of genuine third-party claims by providing clear liability evidence. For van fleets operating in urban environments, where most at-fault accidents happen, dashcam footage can make the difference between a disputed liability claim that runs for 18 months and a resolved claim settled in six weeks. Some insurers offer discounts of up to 10% for forward-facing dashcam fitment across the fleet.

Any driver vs named driver: choosing the right structure for a van fleet

The choice between any-driver and named-driver policy structures is a commercially significant decision for van fleet operators. An any-driver policy allows any authorised employee to drive any van on the policy, subject to age restrictions (typically drivers aged 21 or 25 and over, depending on the insurer). This suits businesses with flexible staffing, shift patterns, or high driver turnover, where it is impractical to update a named driver list with every new hire.

A named-driver policy restricts driving to a specific list of individuals. This is typically cheaper than any-driver cover, often by 10–25% for the same fleet, because the insurer can assess the risk of each driver individually. It suits owner-managed trade businesses where the same five or six people drive the same vans every day. The administrative overhead is that every new driver must be notified to the insurer before they drive, and failure to do so can result in a claim being partially declined. For a detailed comparison of both structures and their premium implications, see our any driver fleet insurance guide.

For growing van fleets, a pragmatic approach is to start on named-driver cover when the team is small and stable, then review the structure at the three-to-five-van stage as driver turnover and operational complexity increase. Some brokers can structure hybrid policies: named-driver cover for the core fleet with an open-driving extension for occasional or temporary drivers. This captures most of the cost advantage of named-driver cover while maintaining operational flexibility. The complete guide to how fleet insurance works covers the structural differences in detail. For quotes, visit our fleet insurance hub.

Reducing van fleet insurance costs: practical steps that work

Premium reduction for van fleets is a medium-term project, not a one-renewal fix. The single most effective step is investing in driver training, because driver behaviour is the root cause of the majority of at-fault van claims. A structured programme, even a half-day online hazard perception refresher run annually for all drivers, can reduce accident frequency by 15–25% over a two-to-three year period. Insurers recognise this: programmes accredited by bodies such as the DVSA or the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) carry weight in renewal negotiations.

Accident management is the second lever. When an accident occurs, how quickly and effectively it is reported, documented, and managed determines the ultimate claims cost. A fleet with clear first-notification-of-loss (FNOL) procedures, a designated accident management contact, and a policy of recording CCTV and dashcam footage immediately will see lower average claim settlements than a fleet that handles incidents informally. This directly improves the loss ratio and feeds into better renewal terms.

Voluntary excess strategy is worth reviewing annually. Increasing the per-van voluntary excess from £250 to £500, or implementing a fleet-level aggregate excess structure for larger fleets, reduces the premium meaningfully and encourages the fleet manager to absorb minor incidents rather than claiming. The correct excess level is one that the business can absorb without cash-flow strain; too high and the fleet self-insures excessively, too low and the premium saving is trivial. Our dedicated article on reducing fleet insurance premiums covers all of these strategies in detail with worked examples. Compare quotes on our fleet insurance hub.

Future-proofing your van fleet: EV insurance and the road to 2030

The UK Government’s 2030 ban on new petrol and diesel van sales, confirmed for vans up to 3.5t gross vehicle weight, is already reshaping fleet purchasing decisions. Many operators are transitioning now, ahead of mandate, driven by lower fuel running costs, clean air zone (CAZ) compliance in cities including London, Birmingham, Bristol, and Bath, and corporate sustainability targets. What is less widely understood is how electric vans affect your fleet insurance, because the underwriting of EV commercial vehicles is meaningfully different from their ICE equivalents.

Higher insured values are the first difference. A Ford E-Transit lists at approximately £49,000 before any grants, versus around £32,000 for the equivalent diesel Transit. A Mercedes eSprinter is priced similarly above its diesel sibling. Higher vehicle values mean higher comprehensive insurance premiums, all else being equal. Insurers also apply a loading for the battery replacement risk: a high-voltage traction battery on a commercial EV costs between £8,000 and £20,000 to replace, and even minor accidents that would be a modest repair on a diesel van can write off an EV if the battery management system registers a fault.

Specialist repair networks are the second issue. Most independent bodyshops and general repairers cannot work on high-voltage EV systems. EV repairs require technicians certified to work with high-voltage circuits, and in 2025, the network of approved EV commercial vehicle repairers in the UK remains significantly smaller than that for diesel vehicles. This means longer average repair times after an accident, which in turn means higher credit hire costs on fleet policies. Some fleet insurers manage this by mandating manufacturer-approved repair networks; others accept independent repairers with relevant EV certifications. Ask your broker explicitly which applies to your policy.

For fleets transitioning gradually, a mixed fleet policy covering both EV and diesel vans under a single policy is available from most specialist fleet insurers. The underwriting approach for mixed EV/ICE fleets treats each vehicle class separately within the portfolio, so a single EV accident does not automatically load the premium on the diesel element of the fleet. Our guide to electric vehicle fleet insurance covers the full transition picture, including charging infrastructure risk, battery lease arrangements, and which insurers are currently most competitive for EV commercial fleets in 2025.

Frequently asked questions